MfE Banned Bags

Figure 1 Examples of plastic bags that were banned in New Zealand from 1 July 2019. Credit: Ministry for the Environment

Global estimates suggest that 1-5 trillion plastic bags are consumed every year. For scale, 5 trillion bags equates to nearly 10 million bags per minute and, if tied together, these would reach around the world seven times every hour. The excessive use of plastic bags, coupled with concerns over their presence in our natural environment, led to many jurisdictions banning single-use plastic bags, including here in Aotearoa New Zealand from 1 July 2019. Since the ban on single-use plastic shopping bags was announced by the Ministry for the Environment, there has been a lot of public interest in whether the evidence shows that the alternative options are really a better choice for the environment. Is a single-use plastic bag better or worse than alternatives such as a paper bag, a heavier reusable plastic bag or a cotton bag?

There is no clear answer to this question. All bags have environmental impacts from resource extraction, the amount of material used, how it is produced and how it is managed at end-of-life. The most environmentally favourable bag choice will be dictated by the environmental impacts of most concern and how many times a person is likely to reuse the bag.

To date, most LCA studies on shopping bags have not accounted for litter – but litter is one of the major concerns driving plastic bag bans. A recent LCA study comparing HDPE (#2), LDPE (#4), PP (#5), paper and biodegradable plastic bags introduced a littering indicator to model littering, by calculating the relative risk between the different options, rather than assigning a final impact.[1]

The study found that the order of environmental favourability for the climate change impact (determined as part of an LCA study) was the opposite to the order determined by the littering potential indicator (see the table below). A reusable plastic bag had the lowest impacts for climate change and all impact categories, but was the second-worst for littering potential.

 

Table 1 Comparison between bag types ranked from best to worst for global warming potential and littering potential

Global warming potential Littering potential
BEST Reusable LDPE bag (at least 10 uses) Reusable PP woven bag with 40% recycled content (at least 20 uses) BEST
  Single-use HDPE bag (1 use + bin liner) Single-use recycled paper bag (1 use)  
  Single-use biodegradable bag (1 use) Single-use biodegradable bag (1 use)  
  Reusable PP woven bag with 40% recycled content (at least 20 uses) Reusable LDPE bag (at least 10 uses)  
WORST Single-use recycled paper bag (1 use) Single-use HDPE bag (1 use + bin liner) WORST

 

This study is one of the first to factor in littering impacts to a bag LCA. Further studies in different contexts and inclusion of other bags (e.g. cotton reusable bags) are needed to address limitations in this initial study, including factoring in that biodegradable bags act the same as single-use plastic bags and could also be used as a bin liner. Use as a bin liner would reduce the likelihood of litter, as the liner would be disposed in landfill with the bag of waste.

Ultimately, the study demonstrates that there are discrepancies between the best bag choices depending on whether you prioritise ‘climate’ vs ‘litter’, but overall, the best environmental outcomes will come from extensive reuse of a bag and appropriate disposal at its end-of-life. Further complexities around bag choice would come from adding other considerations such as health and economics, into the decision.

 

There are discrepancies between the best bag choices depending on whether you prioritise ‘climate’ vs ‘litter’, but overall, the best environmental outcomes will come from extensive reuse of a bag and appropriate disposal at its end-of-life

 

The social aspects of a product ban are not factored into studies of life cycle environmental impacts and littering impacts. Once awareness had been raised by those campaigning to ban the bag, the changing practice was largely driven by the forces of social contagion and has provided educational value in terms of raising awareness around plastic pollution and helping shift people’s attitudes towards sustainability thinking, which is a critical part of the cultural transformation required for rethinking plastics.

References

[1] Civancik-Uslu et al., “Life Cycle Assessment of Carrier Bags and Development of a Littering Indicator,” Science of The Total Environment 685 (2019)

Explore more case studies from Rethinking Plastics

Sustainability through connection, learning and action

With a kaupapa of creating a healthy, peaceful, more sustainable world, Toimata Foundation supports inter-generational learning and action by running two main programmes in schools and communities:…

Reducing the carbon footprint of plastics by using recycled plastic

In a study of the carbon footprint of projected global plastic use between 2015 and 2050, Zheng and Suh modelled a theoretical situation of 100% recycling of plastic in 2050, and found it had a 25%…

A reusable system to replace single-use cups

Globelet offers a reusable cup system for festivals and other events. The cups are made from recycled polypropylene (#5) and manufactured onshore. Globelet provides the following statistics on their…

How big is the plastic clothing problem for Aotearoa New Zealand?

Some plastic articles of clothing are captured in the ‘Plastics and articles thereof’ harmonised trade codes in import data from Statistics NZ, but this does not account for all synthetic fibres im…

A business enabling people to rethink their use of plastic

Ecostore is an exemplar of how a business can take transformative action to rethink how we use plastics and inspire system-wide change. To enable people to reduce their use of non-renewable single-…

New Zealand Post’s quest for an alternative to plastic

The driver: New Zealand Post wants a more sustainable, environmentally friendly alternative to their existing plastic mailers (e.g. courier bags, pre-paid postage bags). New Zealand Post has also…

Para Kore – helping people reduce their waste

Para Kore is a Māori organisation that provides mentoring and support for marae, kōhanga reo, kura, community organisations, iwi, tertiary, commercial sector, events and Māori communities to reduce…

Plastic Bag Free Raglan, Pēke Kirihou Kore Whāingaroa

In October 2018, Whāingaroa Raglan won the Keep New Zealand Beautiful ‘Community Environmental Initiative Award’. The kōrero behind the Award was a story of what happened when a whole community wor…

Controlled plastic decomposition

Plastics are made by joining monomers together to form long flexible chains in a process known as polymerisation. The strength of the bonds formed between monomers is what makes the plastics persis…

Recyclable shoes

As part of its recent pledge to use only recycled plastics by 2024, Adidas revealed a new sneaker made from 100% recyclable materials. Driven by a connection to environmental organisation Parley for…